I wanted to post the comments some lawyers took the time to give me last week that didn’t make it into Sunday’s preview article on the Mark Becker murder trial.
As many of you know by today the trial was delayed due to the weather until Wednesday. If it snows as much as they are predicting in Butler County, up to 10 inches or so, the judge may delay it again. Becker is accused of shooting and killing Ed Thomas, Aplington-Parkersburg football coach.
The discussion I had with some defense attorneys was about the defense strategy in the Becker case.
The facts of the case aren’t in dispute. There were 20 students in the weight room that day who will likely testify regarding what happened June 24. The only fact to be argued is whether Becker was insane at the time of the shooting.
With an insanity defense, Becker will have the burden of proof, instead of the prosecution which is the standard in other criminal cases. His attorney, Susan Flander, must prove Becker didn’t understand the nature and quality of the act or he didn’t understand right from wrong when he fired multiple shots at Thomas on June 24.
Flander didn’t take depositions in the case, so according to criminal procedure she didn’t have to share her witness list with the prosecution. Several defense attorneys speculate she didn’t because this isn’t a true “fact” case — where the facts are disputed.
Mike Lahammer, Cedar Rapids attorney, said this case will heavily rely on the opinions of mental health experts. It would be a waste of time to depose the students who were in the weight room and the police officers who investigated the shooting, he said.
It was probably a strategic reason not to take depositions because it can limit the state’s evidence to what’s been outlined in the minutes of testimony filed with the trial information, said Brian Farrell, board member of the Iowa Innocence project and attorney.
Mark Brown, Cedar Rapids attorney, said it’s not that common in murder cases because depositions can be a good discovery tool. There have been times when Brown has discovered new information during a deposition to help him and be negative for the prosecution, he said.
Robert Rigg, associate professor at Drake University of Law, said the only danger is if the lawyer loses the case it could cause appellate counsel to investigate a possible “claim of ineffective assistance.”
An insanity case really comes down to the “battle of the experts” as Rigg refers to it. Two defense experts will testify as to Becker’s mental state and two prosecution experts will refute it.
During the competency hearing, a defense and prosecution expert, diagnosed Becker as suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. But the defense expert said Becker didn’t understand the charge brought against him and couldn’t assist in his defense. The prosecution expert said Becker was competent and understood.